News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jrintl

09/30/04 10:38 AM

#18537 RE: was Steve #18536

If we go down from here Steve, it would confirm a theory I have that since the end of the bull, 'throwovers' are more prevelant, and it forces one to raise stops (a bit above clear reversal targets) for the easy money is there (for 'da boys') to take out stops, even though a move is reversing. You agree or any thoughts? In other words, now one has to have a 'shorting zone' vs. tight stop

It sucks too, because then you have to lose even more with a higher stop (when wrong)..

Da boys are always going to get there money, and nowadays they have to work for it (taking out stops, etc.). Late 90s were great, cause everyone so fat, these piddling games were not so much played (IMO). Everyone riding same rocket, etc. (that's not to say that those heavy short lame-o stocks didn't get intentionally crushed by insiders to the game too)




icon url

Justa Werkenstiff

09/30/04 10:41 AM

#18538 RE: was Steve #18536

S: Glad to be here. WTF am I anyhow <g>.? VXO collapsed so VXN could as well.