News Focus
News Focus
icon url

EarnestDD

09/01/09 3:30 PM

#9039 RE: ThePennyGuru #9037

That is simply Malcolm's interpretation.

The MRT may have a VERY Different Interpretation which would not provide any form of a continuing lease.
jmo
icon url

ThePennyGuru

09/01/09 3:31 PM

#9040 RE: ThePennyGuru #9037

I believe my actions speak volumes as they represent my confidence in Empire Energy and my personal commitment to the success of this company going forward. Priority one remains drilling and developing our Major Virgin Basin in Tasmania.
Once the regulatory environment is established under which shareholders can legally exercise their right to participate in the upcoming rights offering and I also have exercised my initial rights allocation, I plan to support the full subscription of any remaining or unexercised rights. Fully subscribed, our rights offering will raise Empire a total of U.S. $9 Million (AU$11 Million). This alone will be enough to complete drilling at Bellevue and another selected site.
icon url

sydneyboy

09/02/09 1:50 AM

#9074 RE: ThePennyGuru #9037

Wow. I have watched this board for several months now, and must say it is very entertaining. The whole Empire story is a beauty and if all else fails, Hollywood should come knocking on MB's door to see about writing a screenplay. Maybe they could be the investor he needs?!

One thing though TPG, you say: Both components of this license agreement have been met and the financial commitments that were made by Empire have been surpassed over the period of the 10 year SEL 13/98 tenure.

My questions, and please do not take it as bashing (it just seems like some people on this board do not question things enough), would be:

1. Have you seen the details of the licence agreement?
2. If so, how many wells were meant to be drilled during the 10 years? MRT surely would have ensured the licence stipulated Empire/GSLM must drill?
3. Where was the AU$50,000,000 spent? It is a given that the seismic would have cost several mil. But what happened to the other 40-odd, given no wells were drilled?
4. Also, how was the other $40 mil of spending directly related to the licence requirements?
5. Where did the $50 million come from? Do published external funding figures add up to this amount?

I completely accept there may be legitimate answers to these questions, but they have certainly never been explained properly in public yet.

TO all of your credit, it does look like a lot of fun to be involved in this company and I wish you all the best. I might just wait for more info before getting my feet wet.

Regards. And from the looks of things, I should definitely add: this is all JMO