Replies to post #20997 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[HALF FULL GLASS]

Gold, You are confusing in your contradictions.

In the past you wanted Dr.Wittenberg gone and considered him a negative to the company. You disliked everything about him...Now that he is gone you count that as a negative. Which is it? Wittenberg was good for the company or was Wittenburg bad for the company. Or is it that nothing is good for the company no matter how you look at it?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/post_reply.asp?message_id=39715820

You keep saying that Abbott is not a licensee and yet you keep refering to plural license(s) which would include the Abbott license and the Inverness license.

You stated,"why have the licensees not begun selling any Vet applications? Why would Moro have to wait for any licensees when he already has them?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39678356

Gold stated,"A license is a license."
This should now put to bed the entire argument that you had regarding Abbott Because you are correct,"A license is a license."http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39711825



And now you bring up that Dr. Moro still has an Abbott analyzer in his posession. Why would Abbott leave an expensive analyzer with Biocurex? And you say,"unless he got rid of Abbott" Why is it he would have to get rid of Abbott if in your previous words, Abbott is already gone?".

You stated "Moro has an Abbott analyzer at Pacific BioSciences and he could also run the tests on that machine as long as he did not sign another semi exclusive licensee. If he signed another semi exclusive licensee, he could not use his analyzer unless he got rid of Abbott."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39713517


Then you state that the product will never see a market...

Now you are stating,"From this point for Inverness, there would probably be no real revenue for BioCurex until they started getting royalties from selling tests and that could be at least 18 or more months away even if Inverness started trials really soon." http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39715457

Which is it??? No Market or they will start seeing revenue when the royalties start from selling the test?

You go to get an annual screening test and yet then say screening tests are not good. You stated,"RECAF does not solve those problems and it will lead to a huge number of secondary tests that could even make the situation worse with finding more cancers that should be left alone."
What do you think your annual checkup does? It finds problems that in your opinion should just be left. An enlarged prostate regardless of how it is found is the first step to necessitate a diagnosis.
alone.http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39665912

[opportunityknocking]

Goldseeker, just need to clarify something that I feel is extremely important. You said, "There isn't any way I would buy any of this stock even if Moro signed another licensee. I just do not think there is a viable market for the test."

I hope you are a man of your word, because I don't want any reason for you to get back into this stock, period. No reason!!!! You don't deserve any of the upside that IMO we will see. I just want to put to rest any ideas you have to buy so you can gain unknowing shareholder's trust to then turn around and bash the company. Biocurex and Biocurex shareholders do not want you around once we get are feet off the ground.

Please reverify you will NEVER EVER EVER EVER buy 1 share of Biocurex. Thanks.