News Focus
News Focus
icon url

thebobber

07/18/09 11:34 AM

#179951 RE: Poptech #179950

If Neomedia has attorneys pursuing a case on contingency, then it is a pretty good bet that the attorneys believe the case to be both winnable and ultimately lucrative. No other way to interpret it.

this is true. Many of my friends are attorneys and they that is 100% true. When they take a case on contingency they are 99.5% confident of winning and the only question is the award amount.

After this weeks news I may have to get back into NEOM
icon url

clawmann

07/18/09 11:37 AM

#179952 RE: Poptech #179950

There may be some arrangement in place to pay the attorneys a success fee if they successfully defend the Scanbuy v. Neomedia case. I do not know. But I find it extaordinarily doubtful that an attorney would accept a defense action except on a fee basis.

Perhaps there could be an arrangement like: 1. client pays all litigation expenses on a monthly basis, and 2. If attorney prevails, he gets to bill client for all recorded time and he gets a success fee of $X. But the defense attorney would still want a lot of security for the money that is to be paid at the end if he wins. In a normal case, a plaintiff's attorney working on contingency is paid directly out of the damage award he gets for the plaintiff. In a defense case, there is rarely a damage award to the defendant, so the attorney will want to know where his money will come from if he wins.

BTW, I have never seen Neomedia disclose how their attorneys ae compensated. So no one but an officer or director would know.
The engagment agreement is normally held in pretty strict confidence. The attorney certainly can't disclose it, and the client can but rarely does.