You're correct, any transaction over $10K is tracked. Funny how this was NEVER mentioned before, so it has to be a late in the game trick to throw the bloodhounds in a different direction. Why, however, as I believe Jerle said, would WMI receive statements reflecting such deposits if they were fraudulent? I would think that a $4B fraudulent amount would have been addressed a long time ago, if they truly felt it to be so. This has to be B/S posturing, which tells me that they are searching under the carpets and in behind the chair cushions for counterpoints. Given the Judge's responses to date, I somehow feel that she will not tolerate this for long.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
