News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lifegear

06/29/09 2:32 PM

#34775 RE: Blin #34774

did you flip all your shares and now want back in at a lower price?
icon url

HokieHead

06/29/09 2:36 PM

#34777 RE: Blin #34774

So you think Blackburn would have gone through all the trouble to hire a lawyer and show himself at a township meeting as well as issue a PR stating that if officials do not back off they will be sued?

Seems alot to me if this was a scam. Too much involved imo. I have researched this in much detail and have found no reason that this is a scam.

IR has been up front with any of my questions/concerns and the TA is ungagged.

If it were a scam, what is the purpose? To get the stock to pennies? If so bring it on....
icon url

GBRO

06/29/09 2:39 PM

#34782 RE: Blin #34774

Did the google search and your right.....Im not getting it. You are making some bold accusations and there is no proof so until you can post it for everyone to see then lets drop it and move on.
icon url

inforcash

06/29/09 2:44 PM

#34791 RE: Blin #34774

Blink,

I just read the document and it shows that Rick Blackburn was excluded on the PLAINTIFF side which means that he did not want to accept the $600K settlement. That matches with the IR response. If he was a defendant, I would be more concerned.

Now, I don't argue that being associated with questionable people is a bad thing but I would think during a lawsuit a lot of people are associated to "questionable" people. If that was not the case, there would never be a need for a lawsuit.

Don't know...interesting information, but I don't see enough to make a conclusion...
icon url

lifegear

06/29/09 2:45 PM

#34795 RE: Blin #34774

I will forward your accusations to the company and we'll see what they say, maybe they could get their lawyer to answer to you like they did with the Solicitor