I comprehend the post loud and clear you don't want us to trust IR. However rather than siting examples you use innuendoes and infer things..
Normally if I come up with a theory I have a reason for doing so which pertains to the company (spng) which my theory is about..
To broadly dispute what someone from IR says based off something that took place in another stock isn't a very justifiable theory imo but hey run with it.