News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jimmenknee

06/24/09 4:25 PM

#4276 RE: doogdilinger #4273

No-- just continue to be seriously concerned with how this is being portrayed as opposed to what is actually happening...

So how about it doogdilinger?

What allows Jason to go above the 1% of the OS threshold? More exactly—how does he get around them not being designated "control securities" despite their being "open market" purchases?

Are you able to get updated OS numbers (to include the float)-- that would at least settle that issue -- no?

Or are you just going to concentrate on applying belittling-logic? :-(
icon url

TikiGal

06/24/09 11:33 PM

#4278 RE: doogdilinger #4273

Oh come on Doog. You cannot overlook what is stated in the filings.

This is from the most recent 10K

http://pinksheets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6663849
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $62,398 in the six months ended April 30, 2009. The Corporation, however, had a positive cash flow of $28,482 in the same period, primarily from the sale of equipment and borrowings. The Company closed its retail outlet in November 2008. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the successful stimulation of wholesale sales or in other areas in order to fund operating losses and become profitable. If the Company is unable to make it profitable, the Company could be forced to cease development of operations. Management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in its retail operation. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Development-Stage Company

The Company is considered a development-stage company, with limited operating revenues during the periods presented, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 7. SFAS. No. 7 requires companies to report their operations, shareholders deficit and cash flows since inception through the date that revenues are generated from management’s intended operations, among other things. Management has defined inception as August 1, 2006. Since inception, the Company has incurred operating losses totaling $10,374,532. The Company’s working capital has been generated through the sales of common stock and liquidation of inventory. Management has provided financial data since August 1, 2006 “Inception” in the financial statements, as a means to provide readers of the Company’s financial information to make informed investment decisions.

Going Concern

We have suffered recurring losses from operations and are dependent on our ability to raise capital from stockholders or other sources to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they become due. In their report on our audited financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2008, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosure describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.
icon url

TikiGal

06/24/09 11:35 PM

#4279 RE: doogdilinger #4273

Oh and lets not leave out this part from the recent 10k.
http://pinksheets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6663849


Future Financings

Presently, our revenues may not be sufficient to meet our operating and capital expenses.

Our capital requirements are difficult to plan in light of our current strategy to limit our operations and our products. Since our inception, we have been dependent on investment capital as an important source of liquidity. Our operations presently are generating negative cash flow, and we do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term. We need to secure additional working capital in the short-term in order to sustain our operations and execute our business plan. We have incurred operating losses since inception, and this is likely to continue into the year ended October 31, 2009.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis should it be required, or generate significant material revenues from operations, we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due and we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.
icon url

TikiGal

06/25/09 12:28 AM

#4280 RE: doogdilinger #4273

Doog,

I feel this is an important question not only for the current shareholders here, but the potential future holders.

Who is the third party that hired you? Was it the company or perhaps the financer?

I do hope you answer this question for it being unanswered would bring up some red flags for me. I wouldn't understand why it's confidential. TIA :)

http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/33Act/sec17.html

Section 17 -- Fraudulent Interstate Transactions

1. Use of interstate commerce for purpose of fraud or deceit

It shall be unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities or any security-based swap agreement (as defined in section 206B of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act [15 USCS § 78c note]) by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly--

1. to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, or

2. to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

3. to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

2. Use of interstate commerce for purpose of offering for sale

It shall be unlawful for any person, by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by the use of the mails, to publish, give publicity to, or circulate any notice, circular, advertisement, newspaper, article, letter, investment service, or communication which, though not purporting to offer a security for sale, describes such security for a consideration received or to be received, directly or indirectly, from an issuer, underwriter, or dealer, without fully disclosing the receipt, whether past or prospective, of such consideration and the amount thereof.

3. Exemptions of section 3 not applicable to this section

The exemptions provided in section 3 shall not apply to the provisions of this section.

4. Limitation

The authority of the Commission under this section with respect to security-based swap agreements (as defined in section 206B of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act [15 USCS § 78c note]) shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations of section 2A(b).