When the discussion, +/-, becomes a contentious, continual, re-run battle it needs to stop
Agreed, although I'll point out that it takes two sides to make a "contentious, continual, re-run battle".
The board managers, who know the company/people involved, are in the best position to make that decision
No chance of bias creeping in? I remember one board manager who wanted to delete all messages that weren't "true". Oddly enough, the only "false" statements that were deleted were the negative ones. My biggest concern with the IHUB board manager concept is the ability of the manager to subtly (or not so subtly) influence the content of the conversation. That used to be a major problem here, it has become less so precisely because Matt has not been afraid to stick to his guns and override board manager decisions where he feels it's appropriate.
Are you the Creator, Chairman or Director of any iHub boards..??
Nope. I mostly post elsewhere. So far the focus here has been on pennies and/or trading, areas I'm normally not interested in.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
