Dew,
I do not share your pessimism. The poster presentation seems impressive to me. The following is from the press release.
The analysis concluded that TNFerade appeared to be safe and well-tolerated. The analysis also indicated a 25% reduction in the risk of death in the TNFerade plus standard-of-care (SOC) arm compared to the patients receiving SOC alone (Hazard Ratio = 0.75; 95% Confidence Interval [0.494 - 1.15]).
Dr. Mark Thornton, GenVec's Senior Vice President of Product Development commented on the poster, noting, "In the SOC patients, 75% of the patients died within approximately 11.8 months. However, in the TNFerade plus SOC group, 75% of the patients did not die until approximately 19.4 months. Although the data still need time and events to reach maturity, we are encouraged by the survival trend being observed at this point in the trial."
Please enlighten me as to why the Hazard Ratio if .75 is bad.
Thanks