No, I posted that I saw a footwearetc ad on ihub that featured Skins. The original debate was who's advertisment was it. You claim that it is a Skins advertisment bought and paid for by Skins. I disagree. I already said it could very well be a co-op thing between Skins and Footwearetc were each share the cost, but it's not just Skins. If it were, then Skins is advertisining footwearetc? That makes no sence!
You have seen the MDT, or whatever, and I have also seen one for Uggs. All 3 of the advertisments were the same, just the brand was different. All three were footwearetc ads.
As for why Skins isn't on footwearetc featured list, that is easily explained. In fact you explained it for us. Skins is too new to be very popular yet. If it's not popular enough to bring in customers, it is not featured. Again marketing 101.
As for advertising on iHub, that has been explained as well. If MBT was on the Yahoo boards, then I guess they are guilty of whatever you are accusing Skins of too then... right?
I wish I could remember where I saw the Ugg one.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
