Once again you've stated the same points that I have dominated.
If one ad in a slot shows "Ads by Google," then the entire slot is run by Google Ads. If one ad in a slot shows its root coming from AOL, then the entire slot is run by AOL. I think you should research ads before arguing me here. Code is involved and just because one ad says "Ads by Google" and the next does not does not mean that both are not from Google. I have ads from Google on my own website and when they are flash ads the "Ads by Google" is not shown.
You yourself say that Skins has no money, so how are they paying Footwear Etc. for the ads? There may be some agreement, but Footwear Etc. is definitely paying for the majority of the advertising fees.
Once again, you saying that promoting shoes on a stock message board is unusual is an oxymoron when content is the basis of when and where ads appear.
I'm still in disbelief of your audacity to repeatedly bring up points that I have continually shot down well and succinctly.
There is no leaving it to the readers when it is clear who is wrong. Like I said, keep fighting--it's great for me!