Replies to post #60287 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[Rick Faurot]

Fierce Fighting in Iraq's Najaf, Sadr Defiant
Thu Aug 19, 2004 09:31 AM ET

By Michael Georgy
NAJAF, Iraq (Reuters) - Fierce fighting erupted in the city of Najaf Thursday after a rebel Shi'ite cleric defied an Iraqi government threat to attack his stronghold in a holy shrine and rejected demands that he end his uprising.

Thick black smoke poured into the sky from near the Imam Ali Mosque, soon after Moqtada al-Sadr spurned the ultimatum from interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi. U.S. aircraft and tanks pounded the area around the shrine.

It was not immediately clear if the government's threatened offensive was under way at the mosque, where the radical cleric and his Mehdi Army militia have holed up.

Away from the mosque area, three mortar bombs hit a Najaf police station in quick succession, killing seven police and wounding 21 others, police said.

[Rick Faurot]

Faith-Based Missile Defense
Brad DeLong
August 20, 2004
From Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal:

Why Oh Why Are We Ruled by These Liars? (Missile "Defense" Deployment Edition)

DefenseTech bangs its head against the wall as it contemplates the enormous waste of money that is the Bush administration's "deployment" of a not-working missile defense system:

Defense Tech: FAITH-BASED MISSILE DEFENSE: President Bush put a whole lot of stock in "faith-based" initiatives to solve domestic problems... taking the same approach to military matters. Yesterday, President Bush campaigned at a Boeing plant, promoting his missile defense system.... "We say to those tyrants who believe they can blackmail America and the free world, 'You fire, we're going to shoot it down,'" he said. But... [t]he anti-missile system's effectiveness is a matter of faith... the Defense Department scrapped some of the $10 billion per year program's most important tests....

"Thomas P. Christie, director of the Pentagon's office of Operational Test and Evaluation, said a shortage of testing data would likely make it difficult for him to assess the system's effectiveness ahead of any deployment this year," the Washington Post noted earlier this year. "He expressed concern about the small number and relatively simple nature of flight tests, noting they have used the same course each time and have relied on surrogates and prototypes for key elements still under development."

Slate's Fred Kaplan translates:

In the past six years of flight tests, here is what the Pentagon's missile-defense agency has demonstrated: A missile can hit another missile in mid-air as long as a) the operators know exactly where the target missile has come from and where it's going; b) the target missile is flying at a slower-than-normal speed; c) it's transmitting a special beam that exaggerates its radar signature, thus making it easier to track; d) only one target missile has been launched; and e) the "attack" happens in daylight.

...The situation isn't likely to change any time soon. The next stages of the Pentagon's missile defense plan call for building defenses that can catch enemy rockets before they take off. But in a study last year, the American Physical Society said that couldn't be done with current or near-term American anti-missile technology. So it's no surprise that when the Defense Department tried to show off its anti-missile training program to reporters earlier this year, the wargame had to be rigged in order for the good guys to win.

http://www.tompaine.com/print/faithbased_missile_defense.php