Replies to post #7800 on SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[janice shell]

But they have made one VERY bad mistake. The IRP's that were started after they were aware of Matts role.

There aren't any new IRPs that I'm aware of. And a number of the "old" IRPs claim they're no longer "active"...

[lentinman]

Q&O:

"If you read Matt Browns indictment, manner and means, he probably has (used IHub for illicit gains)."

I agree with your post (almost) entirely, but remember your own word was "probably". That does not mean "certainly".

"But they have made one VERY bad mistake. The IRP's that were started after they were aware of Matts role. That shows they KNEW what the site was being used for."

As to the allowance of IRPs, that's another issue. I don't know whether that will haunt them or not. I still doubt it because it remains a fact that IHub can allow anything and everything IMO - just as the phone company or Outlook email do. The only thing they have an obligation to do is to make sure their own employees are above board. If an employee goes bad, ANY company has liability. To the degree the company didn't 1) make it hard for an employee to go bad or 2) jump on it the minute they found out... their exposure increases.

Len