Replies to post #7689 on SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[zztops]

Phil, you need to read my post more carefully.

[zztops]

Much of the language in your posts is incendiary, Phil. Not only am I not trying to lynch Matt, what I said in my post might serve to help him--he certainly needs some help right now.

[Qone0]

How many friggin' times do I have to say this?

It hasn't been proven in a court of law that Matt was using Ihub to defraud anyone.

Welcome to the Ihub lynch mob.

Phil

Until the quantity of your posts overwhelms the Quality of the opposing view?

[BullNBear52]

You need to give it a rest. The indictment is pretty clear on that. They named an administrator here to 8 felony counts.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=38318367

Matt's problem was he thought every other ISP would resist a federal subpoena like he pretended that Ihub would.

AOL IM has been around for years. I asked someone at work about it and they said no one in their right mind would use that in the commission of a crime.

[frankie_fillet]

well the paper is a bit damning.. would love to hear it straight from the horses mouth.. since matty was a very vocal anti pinky preacher... look how that turned out? btw your pretty anti pink too... and vocal.. lol

and if its all so innocent why is EVO on the lamb?

I hope Bill P writes a book about the whole thing and makes millions...

would love to hear the real story. wouldn't you?

real