bagger, i'm still missing your point.
you're saying that just because "He/she was told of DNAP's advice from their attorneys and stockmarket analysts, more than once" that he's not allowed to table it for discussion or give further public thought about what he believes should be done?
What if Doc T. stopped progressing forward every time someone with any dna/genetic knowledge told him eye color (sub any other pursuit here) couldn't be solved, that it had been researched by many prior to him who invested far greater resources and ultimately abandoned the project?
You get the point and i don't want this thread to become part of the circus distraction which i referenced last night.
best to you and other dnap longs..the "vision" is becoming clearer!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
