News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #78718 on Biotech Values
icon url

palindromy

05/31/09 5:58 AM

#78725 RE: iwfal #78718

A progressive tax system that would be simple, includes welfare while still encouraging people to work -

Have a goods and services tax of maybe 20% on everything made, sold etc in the country.
Provide a fixed income tax credit of 5k for people earning nothing.. ie the dole, 10k for people earning upto 40k.

icon url

bladerunner1717

06/04/09 8:40 PM

#79089 RE: iwfal #78718

(Robert Reich on Bernanke and the deficit. I think it's coming, iwfal, whatever anyone thinks about it.)


Bernanke's Real Message About Budget Deficits





Has Ben Bernanke suddenly become a deficit hawk? In remarks to the House Budget Committee he sounded like one -- calling on Congress to come up with a plan to restore fiscal balance over the long term. "Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth." This from a Fed Chair who's loosened the money supply more than any Fed chair in recent history, printing money as if it were going out of style. What's going on?

Begin with the fact that Bernanke is working more closely with the Treasury any Fed chair since the Second World War. It's doubtful that Bernanke would make a statement like this without it being at least tacitly approved by the White House. Second, Bernanke and the Treasury know that investors are getting antsy about inflation down the road; yields on long-term bonds are increasing. Third, the White House is having trouble getting Congress to come up with some $600 billion it needs to finance universal health care.

My guess is Bernanke is trying to reassure investors he won't let inflation get out of control in coming years. If he has to, when the economy is safely out of the morass, he'll crank up short-term interest rates and squeeze the money supply.

But Bernanke also wants to deliver a message to Congress, a message the White House doesn't want to deliver because it's politically awkward: Congress will have to raise taxes on the wealthy in order to finance universal health care and reduce looming budget deficits. Such tax increases won't slow down the economy because the wealthy don't spend that much anyway (that's what it means to be wealthy -- you've already got most of what you need), but may be necessary, at least to ward off inflation fears.

What sort of higher taxes on the wealthy? Bernanke didn't say, of course, but the White House has already floated limits on deductions and seems willing to consider taxing employee-provided health benefits for employees over a certain income. And maybe lifting the cap on Social Security payroll taxes, at least for workers earning over $250,000 a year.



Bladerunner

icon url

DewDiligence

09/19/09 6:10 PM

#83787 RE: iwfal #78718

The topic of exorbitant executive pay has surfaced on this board from time to time. The compensation package of a departing SVP at PepsiCo could serve as Exhibit “A” for an argument that executive pay is out of control.

This is an excerpt from #msg-41668708, posted today on The Global Demographic Tailwind board:

When she became chief executive officer, Ms. Nooyi [the CEO of PEP] said her first priority was keeping Mr. White as a deputy. He was granted a lucrative [a major understatement!] compensation package as part of his three roles. He had roughly 1 million exercisable options of PepsiCo shares, valued at about $59.9 million, according to the company's most recent proxy statement. Under SEC pay-disclosure rules, PepsiCo reported for Mr. White a 2008 total-pay figure of $10.1 million, far more than any other company executive except for Ms. Nooyi, whose total pay was $13.4 million.

All this for someone who ran PepsiCo’s international beverage/snack-foods business. How hard is it to find someone with the requisite skills for such a task?
icon url

DewDiligence

02/07/12 8:42 AM

#136631 RE: iwfal #78718

AGN’s David Pyott has long been one of the highest paid executives in the drug/biotech industry. Pyott’s compensation package just got a little richer with this award of ~$14M of restricted stock, conditional on future stock-price performance relative to a peer group that has presumably been crafted in a way that makes the targeted goals relatively easy to achieve:

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/850693/000119312512040602/d294326d8k.htm

AGN has added an extraordinary amount of shareholder value during Pyott’s 14-year reign, and the stock is trading close to an all-time high. Still, this is the kind of award that has suggests an out-of-control BoD.