For years and years Arthur Anderson was THE name in accounting. But there is no doubt that there were a couple of real A holes that messed things up for the whole company. BUT that doesn't mean that EVERYONE that ever worked with that firm should be considered a crook, anymore than everyone that worked at Worldcom or Enron should be considered bad. Those companies had some bad seeds at the top and it brought the whole company down.
Point is, it is friggin' unfair to condemn Watford just because he worked there. If that is the worst piece of evidence anyone can find against him IMO it isn't much. For all we know he was a star with Andersen and did a fantastic job.
This board is getting paranoid. Not getting, IS paranoid