Replies to post #1297 on Foreign Correspondence

[otraque]

link to article http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3791870

[Amaunet]

It’s good to see you over here. Now are you gonna buy those fuel rods or just look at them?

I think the Bush Administration selected so risky a strategy because bin Laden is dead and their choices for a dramatic military victory are practically nil.

Sadr is Iran’s boy they were willing before to lend assistance.

The talks were "positive" and the Iranians expressed their willingness to mediate the U.S. dispute with radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, said council member Mahmoud Othman. The Iranians headed to Najaf on Thursday, an al-Sadr aide said.
#msg-2858484

And now when he is in trouble again Iran has caused fresh concern with its test this week of a new version of its Shihab-3 ballistic missile capable of striking targets in Israel as well as U.S. targets in the Middle East.

http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2004/8/0B25122A-36C9-4F6A-815E-BF08913CF172.html

Iran’s way of saying we are willing to mediate again?

Yes, I agree a Bush re-election tactic but one that has been prophesized?

This is a very intriguing quote from July 8, 2004

Saybani also disclosed that Sadr's organization is paying close attention to the political developments in Bagdat (Baghdad). He explained that by accepting the legality of the government formed by Iyad Allawi, they [Sadr's group] conditioned the invasion forces to leave Iraq.

"However, Allawi said that he wanted these forces to stay in the country. In 2005, there will be many great political changes in Iraq. Our group may enter into politics. There may be someone other than Muqtada Al Sadr leading the party," Saybani told.
#msg-3510897

I still read your posts, always have, there be original thought in your messages.

-Am