I totally agree. The name needs to be positively verifiable. Otherwise it's just another name drop with no proof behind it, in my opinion. Some think the valuation of EESO is too low right now and based on the projected revenue it should be way higher,.... but none of the financials can be used in valuation because none are verified as of yet. PR after PR with potential plans of business all over the world is just not doing it. I would rather see concrete proof of this company's financials and have the PPS slowly grow along with EESO rather than see constant swings and confusion based on hype and dissapointment.
Posted by: ctp93 Date: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:24:53 AM
In reply to: LuvThatMoney who wrote msg# 135694 Post # of 135733
Just a name means nothing.
Friday is not about a name. Friday is about VERIFIABLE "positive" info.
Whatever happens, it has to be perfectly clear that it is TRUE, and VERIFIABLE. And if it is a delay or a "no sale" then there has to be something else that meets the TRUE and VERIFIABLE criteria.
It has to be ABSOLUTELY polar opposite of what a pinkie scam would do.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
