News Focus
News Focus
icon url

LuvThatMoney

05/13/09 10:24 AM

#135701 RE: solar fusion #135698

completely agree, name of buyer is only thing we need at this point, if we don't get that then the pps will for sure tank
icon url

ctp93

05/13/09 10:28 AM

#135710 RE: solar fusion #135698

I do believe it is very true. I am not saying it is FAIR or correct on the part of the CSH. I am just saying that it plays into the hands of doubt, and that is the one thing no one can afford on this.

The name alone will not satisfy enough people. Yes some will still see it as the carrot to keep chasing, but we all know that many would LOVE for that to happen because it only furthers their belief that it isn't real.

It is time for something to stand as out UNDENIABLE FACT, and in a good way.
icon url

talkoption

05/13/09 10:51 AM

#135734 RE: solar fusion #135698

Has anybody seen an article about the pig smell project?

You would think that the Dept. of Agriculture would have news on this or some other major new source.

This is not right.
icon url

jimmym4

05/13/09 7:08 PM

#136262 RE: solar fusion #135698

What is important is the name of the buyer.LOL can you inmagine how many calls they will get