I suppose there's a couple of different ways to look at it.
Seems like they could not pay the rent and just keep on stealing all the money from shareholders.
I have to be honest, I gave them major amounts of money of my own free will. I don't defend the failures, but in a pinksheet environment such as we reside in, it certainly should be judged in its proper context.
At this rate they will not be able to break even by 3Q. No money is being generated now by the trading system.
If I am understanding the interview properly, they say that they have reallocated the trading money for the development of other pursuits. I thought they were demonstrating a consistent return, and therefore don't think the decision was the best one, in my opinion.
Caveat emptor. There are business propositions which fail, and there are legal ways to do it. I certainly don't think there was any intention to fail, and I also think many here probably believe the same as I do.
I do get a kick out of Paul's tenacity. He is not generally successful as has been obviously demonstrated over the past couple of years (To put it kindly), but he is still trying.
And although I care less now than I did before, I still hope he succeeds.