News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JoeSmith

04/20/09 9:14 AM

#88968 RE: mauiguy2 #88966

mauiguy2, just for the record, I was aware and posted the same.
I was not positive, and there was little follow up discussion.

I think generally the board was focused on all the negatives at that time.


#msg-34329524
icon url

jdsgungho

04/20/09 12:23 PM

#89052 RE: mauiguy2 #88966

Here is an answer for both your posts to me, Yes I tend to vent and yes I believed the fines were over

Posted by: jdsgungho Date: Sunday, December 21, 2008 12:14:19 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 89049

We all have opinions of this deal and they all differ from one another, I believe that the shares are now tradeable under rule 144 and that the fines are no longer being imposed. I also believe that management made the best possible decision at the time and used the money wisely. It is also my understanding that it was never forseen that the s-1 would take the amount of time it did, but it has.

Bottom line is, IMO. That management (dpdw) NEEDS to clarify to the shareholders, the process which is taking place and what we as shareholders can expect next.

Its no secret i have been a long term supporter of this stock and the uncertainity even has me bewildered at times.

Clarification in the matter of the private placement shares needs to be resolved and confidence must be restored.

This is just my opinion, but i believe it is imperitive to the future relations between investor and company. I hope your reading this Mr. Smith(JMHO)