we agree then that the government is holding back information.
for what possible reason would they do that.. and specifically
why not show all the frames of the video regarding whatever
hit the pentagon?
can your imagination even conjure up a reasonable explanation?
"Some of the things you are grasping
for here have been debunked, just as this side
has done with the 9/11 commission report."
give me just one for instance
"Let me ask you this. You are at a trial, let's
say it's a murder trial. You get expert forensic
reports on both sides, but completely different
opinions, based on the factual evidence."
let's apply this to 9/11...
The government's lawyers try to prove the following to me as
a juror..
1. I shouldn't believe my own eyes because my own eyes tell
me those buildings fell as if it were a controlled demolition.
I'm not the only one who saw it that way. The reporters at
the time said the same thing. The government says don't
believe their testimony either.
To prove our own eyes are lying to us, the government comes up
with one scenario after another. First, it was the pancake
theory, then it was the impact of the planes knocked off all
the fire protection off the beams.
So the government keeps changing it's story in an attempt to
make me doubt what I saw.
I don't need any other experts on the opposite side, not if
you're going to try to convince me I didn't see what I know
I saw.
2. Terrorists were able to take some flight school lessons and
pull off complicated maneuvers that are best pilots say they
couldn't do. But relative amateurs WERE able to?
good grief...
The list is so long of things that don't add up, don't make sense, and go against all common sense.
"What I am trying to say is this works both ways.
Perhaps the public is being duped (or protected)
but you have got to consider you are being had
as well."
I'm not being had by anything or anyone. I know what I saw
and I have enough common sense to know that when one side is
hiding information and changing their story to make it more
believable... I don't need to hear the opposing side, they've
convicted themselves in my book.
The evidence is the same for both of us. You may choose to
trust/believe the government when it makes an elaborate case,
albeit a changing one) to convince you to doubt your own eyes.
You may choose to believe the government when they tell you
that amateur pilots made those maneuvers. You may choose to
believe the government when they tell you they had never
envisioned terrorists using planes to hit buildings.
lol, that's one of my favorites.. what a total lie
You may believe the side that is hiding information and trying
to thwart any investigation and refusing to testify...
that's your choice. it seems an incredibly poor choice..
I'm definitely not buying all those lies... all at once... and
this is just a minute fraction of the details, a minute sampling
of the official story that makes no sense whatsoever...
the government has debunked itself, no other testimony required
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
