News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #75482 on Biotech Values
icon url

bridgeofsighs

04/04/09 8:12 PM

#75501 RE: genisi #75482

Liraglutide Data & Cancer-FDA Briefing Report

Interesting read

1) In Rats, thyroid c-cell tumors occurred at all doses tested in males and females in a 104-week repeat subcutaneous dose study of 0.075, 0.25, or 0.75 mg/kg/day liraglutide in Sprague Dawley rats (Table 1), but survival was unaffected by treatment (See data in Table 1).

2) Focal c-cell hyperplasia, a preneoplastic lesion, increased above concurrent control groups and above the historical control group range at >0.075 mg/kg liraglutide in males and at >0.25 mg/kg in females.

3)In mice, C-cell hyperplasia dose dependently increased above concurrent controls and above the historical control group range at >0.2 mg/kg liraglutide in males and females. Based on historical control group data from CD-1 mice, ............
4) Applicant proposed a novel GLP-1 receptor-dependent mode of action, then performed mechanistic studies to evaluate it. The proposed mode of action is:
a) GLP-1 receptor agonists activate thyroid c-cell GLP-1 receptors.
b)C-cell GLP-1 receptor activation stimulates calcitonin secretion (calcitonin is a ‘prehyperplasia’ biomarker).
c)C-cell GLP-1 receptor activation increases calcitonin synthesis.
d)Persistent calcitonin secretion and increased calcitonin synthesis causes c-cell hyperplasia.
e)C-cell hyperplasia progresses to c-cell tumors, including progression of benign adenomas to carcinomas.

5) Liraglutide different from Exenatide because:
Liraglutide (NN2211 or NNC 90-1170) is a lipidated GLP-1 analog with prolonged
pharmacologic activity after subcutaneous administration (Figure 1). Its prolonged activity is due to delayed absorption resulting from self association of the attached lipid and because liraglutide is highly plasma protein bound in systemic circulation, it is resistant to inactivation by DPP-IV.
icon url

genisi

04/17/09 3:40 PM

#76148 RE: genisi #75482

Perhaps checking patients for blood calcitonin levels is a good place to start.

According to Daniel Bradbury and Orville Kolterman, who answered questions during AMLN CC, calcitonin levels are being measured from baseline in DURATION-5 following the liraglutide panel, and they might measure levels also from previous DURATION trials.



icon url

genisi

06/08/09 8:34 AM

#79224 RE: genisi #75482

LEAD-3: Two-year data reveal sustained glycemic improvements with liraglutide [and no difference in calcitonin levels]

http://www.endocrinetoday.com/view.aspx?rid=40663

American Diabetes Association's 69th Scientific Sessions

Liraglutide monotherapy for two years was associated with significant, sustained improvements in glycemic control and body weight compared with glimepiride monotherapy, according to new results of the LEAD-3 trial.

At two years, patients assigned to once-daily liraglutide 1.8 mg (Victoza, Novo Nordisk) experienced a 1.1% decrease in HbA1c levels from baseline compared with 0.9% with the 1.2-mg dose and 0.6% with glimepiride. Additionally, more patients assigned to the human glucagon-like peptide 1 analog achieved a target HbA1c <7% (1.8 mg, 58%; 1.2 mg, 44%) at two years compared with glimepiride (37%).

The data are similar to the one-year data published in The Lancet in February, which concluded that liraglutide 1.8 mg reduced HbA1c by 1.14% and the majority of patients achieved a target HbA1c of <7%.

LEAD-3 compared the safety and efficacy of once-daily liraglutide at two doses – 1.8 mg and 1.2 mg – and glimepiride 8 mg. The trial had a one-year randomized, double-blind period followed by an open-label extension. About 90% of one-year completers entered the extension and 73% completed two years of treatment.

Liraglutide was associated with sustained weight loss; glimepiride was associated with sustained weight gain. After two years of treatment, mean body weight decreased significantly (-2.7 kg) among patients assigned to liraglutide 1.8 mg compared with an increase of 1.1 kg with glimepiride.

Hypoglycemia (<56 mg/dL) was more than six times less frequent among patients assigned to liraglutide at either dose compared with glimepiride.

In addition, intention-to-treat and two-year completer analyses revealed comparable between-group HbA1c differences. The researchers reported significant reductions in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and hypoglycemia with liraglutide vs. glimepiride in an intention-to-treat analysis.

The researchers reported a new finding that calcitonin levels remained stable and did not increase during the two-year period in a subset of 146 randomized patients. Further, there was no differentiation in calcitonin level by treatment.

“There does not seem to be any cause for concern with regard to calcitonin as a marker of excess c-cell stimulation. While there may be some issue with regard to GLP-1 stimulation of c-cells in rodents it does not appear in humans,”
Alan J. Garber, MD, Endocrine Today Chief Medical Editor and professor of medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said in an interview. – by Katie Kalvaitis