News Focus
News Focus
icon url

*~1Best~*

03/30/09 2:13 PM

#8153 RE: Trisha #8147

It would be a disaster.

Congressmen call out against nuclear Iran

In letter to President Obama, representatives offer sanctions to be imposed on Iran if talks fail
Yitzhak Benhorin

WASHINGTON – A group of US congressmen, including House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Democrat), have sent a letter to President Barack Obama urging him to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.


Op-Ed
Military clash with Iran / Alex Fishman
Tehran aims to create Gaza missile base that can cover whole of central Israel
Full Story
In Friday's letter, initiated by Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Howard L. Berman, the congressmen recommend prioritizing the Iranian threat in talks with Russia and China.


They write, "We write in strong agreement with your firm position that Iran cannot be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon. We are distressed by the recent International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report that Iran has already stockpiled enough low enriched uranium to generate one nuclear weapon."


In the coming days Obama is scheduled to form his policy towards Iran. The congressmen agree that the policy should include dialogue with the Islamic Republic, but "engagement must be serious and credible, and cannot be open-ended".


"Our goal should be to bring about Iran’s near-term suspension of uranium enrichment, and we should offer Iran meaningful incentives in order to achieve this goal," the letter states.


"But we cannot allow Iran to use diplomatic discussions as a cover for continuing to work on its nuclear program. Iran must verifiably suspend its uranium enrichment program within at most a few months of the initiation of discussions."


The congressmen warn that waiting until after Iran's elections in June could give Tehran six months in which to enrich more uranium and hoard it.


Should the dialogue come up empty-handed, the letter says, the US should apply a number of sanctions including the sanctioning of the banks of Iran as well as international banks that continue to do business with them, denying access to companies whose ships call on Iranian ports, and the sanctioning of insurance and energy companies that have dealings with Iran.


They also urge Obama to call on US allies to join the sanctions. "They should be prepared to prohibit Iranian banks from operating on their territory and to cease allowing Iran to conduct international financial transactions in Euros, pounds, and yen. Similarly, they should stop the practice of providing export credits to their companies seeking business in Iran," the congressmen explain.



icon url

midastouch017

03/31/09 12:52 AM

#8154 RE: Trisha #8147

Letter From The Boss:


As the CEO of this organization, I have resigned myself to the fact that Obama is our President and that our taxes and government fees will increase in a BIG way. To compensate for these increases, our prices would have to increase by about 10%.

But since we cannot increase our prices right now due to the dismal state of the economy, we will have to lay off six of our employees instead. This has really been bothering me, since I believe we are family here and I didn't know how to choose who would have to go.

So, this is what I did. I walked through our parking lot and found six 'Obama' bumper stickers on our employees' cars and have decided these folks will be the ones to let go. I can't think of a more fair way to approach this problem. They voted for change, I gave it to them.

I will see the rest of you at the annual company picnic.

icon url

*~1Best~*

03/31/09 4:14 PM

#8156 RE: Trisha #8147

re New Balad MK praises Iran's nuke quest

Did Israel say Iran should be demolished from the face of the world? Did United States say Iran should be demolished from the face of the world map? Does Israel have terrorists around the world? That's what Iran said about Israel and United States. What Zuabi said is mentally sick and illogical to equate the two different country mentalities.
____________________________________________________________

New Balad MK praises Iran's nuke quest

Mar. 31, 2009
Samuel Sokol, Special to The Jerusalem Post , THE JERUSALEM

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1238423651844&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

New Balad MK Haneen Zuabi, the first woman to be elected to the Knesset as a representative of an Arab party, has welcomed Iran's growing influence on Palestinian affairs and praised Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon as a means of offsetting Israel's regional military edge. Having Israel as the region's sole nuclear power, she said, was "dangerous to the world."



Interviewed in English twice in recent days - in her Knesset office and in a Jerusalem hotel - Zuabi, one of Balad's three MKs and the former director of the I'lam: Media Center for Arab Palestinians in Israel, said Iran's role in Palestinian affairs was "more useful" than that of regimes like Jordan and Egypt, in that Iran stood more firmly "against occupation than a lot of the Arab countries. This is our interest."

She said Egypt and Jordan were scared of a free and democratic Palestinian state.

Queried regarding Iran's quest to manufacture nuclear weapons, Zuabi stated that having Israel as the region's sole nuclear power was disadvantageous. "It would [sic] be more supporting me to have a counter-power to Israel," she said. "I need something to balance [Israel's] power."

Zuabi was asked if she felt worried, living among Jews, that Iran was getting close to acquiring a nuclear weapon. She replied: "No, I am not." Indeed, she said was "more afraid from the Israeli nuclear [weapons]."

Israel does not officially admit to a nuclear weapons capability, but is widely believed to have had such a capability since the 1960s.

When asked if she thought that Israel would use nuclear weapons, she replied, "The Israelis? I think yes… And I am afraid from real risk rather than from potential risk."

The Iranian bomb was only "a potential" threat. The real danger was the Israeli army, she said. "Every day the Israeli [army] uses its violence, army violence."

Zuabi said that Israel was an aggressor state, and that only a situation similar to that which existed between the Soviet Union and United States in the form of the doctrine of "Mutually Assured Destruction" would restrain Israel. "It is more dangerous to the world, more dangerous to everyone, more dangerous to the Palestinians, to Israelis, to have Israel as the only powerful state. I need something to balance its power because this balance of power will [sic]restrict the Israeli using of power. The Israeli violence of the army is an outcome of Israel's convenient feeling that no one will restrict her, that no Arab country will really declare a war against [Israel]."

She added: "I believe that [Israel] would respect its use of power if she's afraid of others. The fact that [Israel]is not afraid of Arab countries, the fact that [Israel]is not afraid of a potential declaration of our Arab world to declare war against Israel, makes Israel more violent. You understand me?"

Asked whether an Iranian bomb would make America nervous and lead to more US pressure on Israel, and whether that would be good from her point of view, Zuabi replied: "Exactly."

Zuabi declared that the very concept of a Jewish state was "inherently racist", saying that Israel must be turned into a "state of all its citizens," which would eliminate its Jewish or Zionist nature.

The Knesset Central Elections Committee disqualified the Balad party from running in the recent elections due to its members' refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state and reported calls for violence against it. The ban was overturned by the Supreme Court.

Responding to Zuabi's comments, Balad party chairman Dr, Jamal Zahalka said: "I think Ms. Zuabi tried to explain some analysis [about] what's [sic]better if you have. [But] this is not a position. It's an analysis [of] what would be safer for the region, if there is a balance." Her comments, he said, did not constitute "supporting a nuclear weapon in Iran."

Some of Zuabi's statements were consistent with her previously stated views. On February 13, she was quoted by the Balad-affiliated Arabs48 internet news site saying that "Balad's concept, which rejects the 'Jewish state' idea, is the only idea that can remove [Avigdor] Lieberman from the circle of political and moral legitimacy… When you agree with the 'Jewish state' idea, you necessarily agree with the idea of loyalty to this state. Rejecting the 'Jewish state' concept will block the road for anyone who demands our loyalty to such a state. There is no logic in demanding that I be loyal to an idea to which I do not agree to begin with, especially since I am proposing an alternative and fighting for it… The language of democracy does not speak of loyalty. This is a language of fascism, just like Lieberman. The language of democracy speaks of rights, equality, and values."

The writer is a freelance journalist affiliated with the Philadelphia Bulletin.