Replies to post #158849 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[nutsoc]

BC, I may have missed something. I've been here since just when TS was beginning to tout NEOM. I've read every post. I have never known YJ to be the type of poster as you describe him. :)

nut

[Drmyke3]

YJ, I don't see (hear) you as a negative voice.
Dr. mike

[clawmann]

I'm going to support YJ here. Many of us, me first and foremost, had serious and very well-founded issues with the way this company was run (into the ground) by previous management, and with the way that YA provided the funding.

Construing this as "bashing" the company or the tech simply grossly misses the point and demonstrates an inability to make subtle but important distinctions.

We are all shareholders. And some of us have invested serious money in our shares, shares that we bought with the idea that management would act prudently, professionally and in our interest. What were we supposed to do when we saw management and others destroying our wealth (and the company) through self-serving and/or paralytically stupid decisions? Just pretend it wasn't happening? Just shut up and eat our spinach?

Taking action and making statements aimed at reminding managment of their fiduciary duties to us (i.e. holding management accountable) is not "bashing", and shame on anyone who says it is.

[Rotten Johnny]

I stand behind YJ

100%.

Enough said...JP

[beam11]

YJ - I have been trying to find out what all the heat/hot discussion was about back to around late morning to mid day. I had to leave after my post.

I have to thank you again, for all of your very ernest dedication to the board, JP too, and I must say, if anyone has presented a new and entirely different concept or body of information regarding our education and knowledge of the unfolding future events of NEOM's position/participation in the mobile advertising market as well as prior, current and future expected position/participation of Gav., I have not read it, as it has not been presented to the IHub NEOM board, up to and including the recently repost of a contributor's prior post.

Often times the perception of negativity is only one person's limited understanding or misunderstanding of our true purpose of discussions on our NEOM board - which has always consisted of a voice for everyone to participate considering all of NEOM's positive and negative factors which influence our NEOM investment purpose in grouping together here.

I appreciat the fact that we have in the past been fortunate to have some of the best/brightest knowledgeable individuals presenting information here on NEOM.

A new contributor's post was re posted on the board today, plus an additional post regarding accusations of negativity of a long time contributor. The first time I read the re posted post I scanned it and wondered if perhaps the work of many other long term dedicated contributors, in getting the word out about NEOM, had come up with another moniker, to summarize the work of Chip and Iian over the past 18 months while getting ready for the "best of all news - the PTO decision". The assumption from some of us was there must be one person out there seeking to bring all of the positive comments from our board, by many contributors, into one body of writing!

While I have to respect the tireless effort of any one posting what appears to be 5 to 6 typed pages of NEOM future events unfolding before our eyes, I am unable to recognize any body of information, presented therein which has not previously been presented to our board by other dedicated NEOM board contributors.

Beam11