Their release reads like a bad attempt at communication by a consultant.. like repeating 5 times the same argument in a line, if you cut it to basics:
"emphasize (our) complete confidence [in] well substantiated and valid (results) scrutini[zed] [by] the international scientific community (..) which they were. "
wow.
They do have a partnership with Abbott, however, so someone must have done some check up...to scrutizine these well-substantiated-which-they-were valid results :)