There are obviously people who as a matter of "freedom to say whatever" float negatives to see what works best in creating doubt in investor phsycology. The higher the level of doubt created the more they spout negatives. Little intrest if any is based insuring any truth or validity is present in their comments. On the other side you have some who make outlandish claims of potential gains which also detracts from reality. This is a company that has to prove that it is for real, so far so good. Vigilance of those that invest is always prudent. But there is ample reason to wait and see whether the company can validate the Hydrongen Generation add on into commercial applications.
Mick rather than repeating the "you should change the story", why don't you put down your understanding of the current A/S and O/S and restricted shares. I think the company's PR don't support the outrageous 6BB statements by others and the conversation with the TA likely was crap but the company's A/S and O/S is not well understood. Not complaining, the PR that discussed the issue with settling the un-wind did have numbers. Appeared to me that the settlement was work in progress and I do congratulate INCL for the transparency. Also probably time to get PR out with status of settling the stock changes and indicating status of the unwind.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
