After reading your post over a few times, I appreciate the time you took to write that to me. I am well aware of how trades work and L2 etc., but thanks. I am pretty good with charts already after some years of study and I have made the determination that I don't like the A/D line and all of its derivatives. especially for pinks since they are so easily maipulated with paint at the open and close. But I feel that A/D is too simple, more useful for a big cap with solid $volume for a few years. A/D is determined solely based on open, close and range, not even any volume: (((C - L)-(H - C)) / (H - L)) = CLV
And I'm not quite sure how you've made this leap of yours. CMF (5) shows you the same thing as CMF(20), just with a shorter time sample.
"CMF(5) supersensitive because of its short period and the use of bars on my 'sunset chart' brings out MM executions of the trades each day with momentum, direction and value."
I know this is just your opinion; I was asking how you had come to it. "This is all my interpretation because of the confirmations I have gotten." And while I respect the 'confirmations you have gotten,' I still need more information and validity. when you find it, please let me know. thanks
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
