News Focus
News Focus
icon url

zguy

02/04/09 1:45 PM

#44404 RE: Sputnik #44401

Nope, that's not the reason for a "tight hole" status. Keep digging though and you might figure it out!
icon url

Big Mur

02/04/09 1:46 PM

#44405 RE: Sputnik #44401

Do we have to get on this merry-go-round again?

How many times does someone have to point out what the KGS site itself says about it's data?
How many people have to describe where the data comes from?
How many times does it have to be explained it's limitations and unreliable nature for coming up with accurate, specific information?
It's provided as a service to Kansas taxpayers to know what taxes are being collected... not as a means to track oil production and Oil and Gas industry specific activities.

HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT HAVE TO BE SAID?

It's a good thing I cut my hair short last month... I can't get a good grip to pull it out.

*exasperated* (okay, not really exasperated so much as entertained... I can't let posts like that go by having fun doing ALL the play acting)
icon url

kelseyf

02/04/09 2:06 PM

#44409 RE: Sputnik #44401

Yup 84 BBLs per vertical well not horizontal well.

Maybe that is why Hemi has applied for "tight-hole" status.

By the way you still have not addressed my earlier post, let me simplify the topic.

In your opinion, how many vertical wells do you think a ~2000' horizontal well would equate too?

Then as a math exercise take your 84 number and play it out for starters.

Kels