Replies to post #6453 on ER Urgent Care Holdings Inc (ERUC)

[greedy__malone]

stocklawmike could you explain what I have posted that would fall under "Wrongfull accusations"?

The financials clealry showed this company was operating at substantial losses.

Many people who sold their practices to ERUC had to sue ERUC in order to retrieve rent and other payments due to them.

There is a long list of people who sued ERUC in order to recoup what ERUC owed them.

ERUC reverseed this stock and has diluted this into the billions once again.

They touted a buyback while diluting.

They touted a preferred share exchange for months that is not going to take place.

They were selling stock to cover losses but eventually ran out of buyers which caused them to start defaulting on their obligations.

There is nothing "wrongful" about it. It's all documented in PR's and their financial filings with pink sheets. I said long ago they were a bankrupt company utilizing shares to bridge the gap between their loss and their obligations.

Evidently I was right was I not?

[greedy__malone]

Why else would Misoouri be investigating ERUC?

YEs Blanco was served a C&D order and yes Mark Solomon was his attorney.

I have a copy of that C&D order. Anybody can get one by contacting the Missouri Attorney General and requesting a copy of it.

It's even free.

It is just a little more than slightly odd that these two would hook up again in the future with ERUC is it not?

Well maybe not to some but it is odd to me and it is also a possibility that the reason Missouri would investigate would be due to the fact that ERUC was selling unregistered shares and Blanco was under a C&D order that forbid him from doing so.

Who knows. it was a guess that is being supported with known facts from the past.