News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #4716 on The board room
icon url

wall_rus

01/31/09 11:01 AM

#4718 RE: wall_rus #4716

"GLOBALIZATION": the undermining of the nation state as a focus of economic
organization; the reduction to commodity status of worldwide raw goods suppliers; the monopolization of distribution channels by transnational trading companies; the reduction of health & quality standards to least common denominator levels; the most honest self characterization of the NWO agenda.

Capturing more broadly the scope of the "free trade" campaign, "globalization" expresses the intent to homogenize the world economy to make national borders transparent to the transfer of capital and goods, and enable a higher order of centralized global management. The claim is frequently made that this will lead to a leveling of prosperity levels on a global basis, but with some exceptions, the evidence is all to the contrary. What we see instead, and as we should expect from how "development" is structured and "free trade" is implemented, is that "globalization" leads to a greater prosperity disparity between the "developed" and "developing" nations, as measured by the disposable income and living standards of the general populations. The greatest real prosperity gains have been achieved by those countries which created domestic synergy in their economies through selective protectionism (eg., Japan).


"FREE TRADE": the systematic destabilization of national and regional economic arrangements, by means of treaties such as GATT and NAFTA, in order to take economic decision making as far as possible from any democratic process, and centralize global economic control into the hands of the corporate elite.

"Free trade", it would seem from the corporate media's propaganda, is universally accepted by all reputable economists as the One True Path to prosperity and progress. Such a belief, which does not in fact enjoy a consensus among economists, is historical nonsense. The Great Economies, such as those of the U.S., Imperial Britain, and modern Japan, were developed under nurturing protectionist policies. Only when they achieved considerable economic strength did these countries begin to adopt "free trade" policies, as a way to prevent other nations from catching up.

An economy (see also: "Reform") is an ecosystem. A strong economy is one that has diversity and synergy. When "free trade" is imposed on an underdeveloped economy, it develops in a distorted way, and is over dependent on external market fluctuations. Such weakness increases the bargaining leverage of the multinationals, which is the obvious objective of "free trade" in the first place.

icon url

eaglesurvivor

01/31/09 11:15 AM

#4722 RE: wall_rus #4716

wall: Oh Pat, consciously or unwittingly, baitch slaps the likes of Drug Rush Limp Wrist and all the other pom-pom boys ... err girls, who pumped and pumped NAFTA, GATT, and WTO. Remember his ridicule of the WTO protesters?

"The WTO enshrines as infallible dogma the tenets of a 19th-century free-trade cult that helped to reduce Britain, homeland of the Industrial Revolution, to today’s third-tier manufacturing power."

Yeah, Mr. Buchanan, you got that one down pat.