News Focus
News Focus
icon url

NYBob

02/01/09 1:35 AM

#533 RE: Legato #526

THE NWO on youtube - CNBC from Davos -

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/81301



The Obama New World Order Threat? -

http://www.visionrevisited.com/Obama-New-World-Order_1/Obama-New-World-Order.htm?gclid=CPa37_POupgCFRBbagodjlPvZA

Congress sued to remove prez from White House 'Defendants had to ensure the Constitution is upheld' -
Posted: January 31, 2009
12:00 am Eastern

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87622
--

Constitutional eligibility for Obama to be President is being contested on three fronts -

Court, Congress and college challenged on constitutionality -

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=86325

Please, join in praying and asking our Father God -
to get the truth and fairness for all American people -

the anti-Christian history by the666 -
gratia..ex.
In 1962, shortly after 666? became judges -

our anti-American Supreme Court banned school prayer -

in 1963 it outlawed Bible reading -

and in 1980, it outlawed the posting -

of the Ten Commandments -

ex..in schools where children could see them -

which is a 180 degree about face from the principles -

of our Forefathers and the Holy Bible -

http://christianparty.net/theyarebylawhischildren.htm

http://www.obamacrimes.info/allcourtdocs.html

http://www.obamacrimes.info/index.html


By every definition of the word, ignoring existing law
as enacted by the our anti-American Supreme Court law is "treason"


http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
Main Entry: trea�son
Pronunciation: 'trE-z&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English tresoun, from Old French traison, from Latin tradition-, traditio act of handing over, from tradere to hand over, betray -- more at TRAITOR
Date: 13th century
1 : the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY
2 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family

Main Entry: trai�tor
Pronunciation: 'trA-t&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English traitre, from Old French, from Latin
traditor, from tradere to hand over, deliver, betray,
from trans-, tra- trans- + dare to give -- more at DATE
Date: 13th century
1 : one who betrays another's trust or is false to an
obligation or duty
2 : one who commits treason


The US Constitution grants Congress the authority to remove
civil officers from office and to establish the penalty
for treason


http://fathersmanifesto.com/usconstn.htm
US Constitution

SECTION 4.

All civil offices forfeited for certain crimes.

The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of
the United States, shall be removed from office
on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason,
bribery, or other high crimes and
misdemeanors.

SECTION 3.

Treason defined. Proof of. Punishment

1. Treason against the United States shall consist only
in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on
the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act,
or on confession in open court.

2. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment
of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work
corruption of blood, or forfeiture, except during the life
of the person attainted.


Congress has established that the penalty for treason
is the death penalty


http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/115/sections/section%5F2381.html
United States Code
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

Section 2381. Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States,
levies war against them or adheres to their enemies,
giving them aid and comfort within the United States
or elsewhere, is guilty of treason
and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned
not less than five years and fined under this title
but not less than $10,000; and
shall be incapable of holding any office under
the United States.

http://christianparty.net/traitors.htm


http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/01/military-to-pledge-oath-to-obama-not.html


Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution
Conservative News and Reporting
"News for the Rest of Us"
Michele Chang

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution.

"The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself." the spokesman said, "At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution."

The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes too far.

"Technically, we can't talk about it before it becomes official policy." the spokesman continued. "However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass."

Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear.

"The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib."

"We expect a lot of flak over this," the classified memo continues. "But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control."

The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

Our Father God will not tolerate the 666treasons for long -

the offense of betraying the State or subverting the

government of the State to which the offender belongs;

betrayals...

gratia..ex.
In 1962, shortly after 666? became judges -

our anti-American Supreme Court banned school prayer -

in 1963 it outlawed Bible reading -

and in 1980, it outlawed the posting -

of the Ten Commandments -

ex..in schools where children could see them -

which is a 180 degree about face from the principles -

of our Forefathers and the Holy Bible -

http://christianparty.net/theyarebylawhischildren.htm

http://www.obamacrimes.info/allcourtdocs.html

http://www.obamacrimes.info/index.html

http://www.888c.com/
God Bless us -
Amen

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=35215611