News Focus
News Focus
icon url

yayaa

07/07/04 1:32 PM

#53372 RE: OrangeFluffyCat #53368

Economy Set for Best Growth in 20 Years
Jul 6, 3:35 PM (ET)

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER

(AP) The economy appears headed for a banner year despite a springtime spike in energy prices.



WASHINGTON (AP) - The economy appears headed for a banner year despite a springtime spike in energy prices and a recent increase in interest rates.

In fact, many analysts are forecasting that the overall economy, as measured by the gross domestic product, will grow by 4.6 percent or better this year, the fastest in two decades.

There were strong 4.5 percent growth rates in 1997 and 1999, when Bill Clinton was president and the country was in the midst of a record 10-year expansion.

But if this year's growth ends up a bit faster than that, it will be the best since the economy roared ahead at a 7.2 percent rate in 1984, a year when another Republican president - Ronald Reagan - was running for re-election.

"We are moving into a sweet spot for the economy with interest rates not too high, jobs coming back and business investment providing strength," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Bank One in Chicago, who is predicting GDP growth of 4.8 percent this year.

President Bush is highlighting the improving economy at every opportunity while Democratic challenger John Kerry has focused on what he calls a middle class squeeze of rising health and tuition costs and laid-off workers forced to take lower-paying jobs.

Who will win on the all-important pocketbook issues? Economists aren't sure.

"It is unclear whether voters will remember the past year and the better jobs created during that period or the past four years," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Economy.com. "It will be a close call and that is one of the reasons the election could be so close."

Assessing the economy at midyear, most private economists are sticking with the optimistic forecasts they had six months ago, even though inflation, driven by surging energy prices, rose higher than expected and the Federal Reserve started raising interest rates last month.

"We are looking for a darn good year despite the fact that we had a big jump in oil prices and interest rates are going up faster than people thought would occur," said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's in New York.

Offsetting those drags on the economy has been stronger growth in Japan and China, which helps U.S. exports, better-than-expected consumer spending and much better job growth than analysts were expecting as the year began.

The economy has now created 1.5 million new jobs since last August, compared with a loss of 2.7 million jobs in the previous 29 months, when the country was struggling with a string of blows from a collapsing stock market to a recession and terrorist attacks.

Even with the 10 months of consecutive job gains, Bush is still facing a 1.2 million jobs deficit, from the last peak for employment in March 2001.

However, many analysts anticipate the economy will generate around 200,000 jobs per month over the next six months, a pace that would be enough to erase his deficit figure by the end of the year. That would enable him to escape being the only president since Herbert Hoover in the Great Depression to have lost jobs while in office.

Although the economy created only 112,000 jobs in June, after averaging 304,000 jobs for the previous three months, analysts expect strong job growth the rest of this year.

They predict the unemployment rate - stuck at 5.6 percent for most of this year - will improve gradually, to 5.3 percent by December, as a strengthening job market draws people back into the labor force.

Analysts also are optimistic about inflation in the months ahead, noting that oil prices recently retreated from peaks above $42 per barrel in June, and regular gasoline have declined from highs over $2 a gallon in late May. If the trend continues, inflation pressures will be eased.

The Bond Market Association's economic advisory committee, made up of economists from large financial institutions, is predicting that consumer prices will rise 3.1 percent for all of this year, a significant moderation from the 5.1 percent rate of increase through May.

The group projects overall GDP growth will be at a 20-year high of 4.7 percent, based in part on a belief that the Fed will keep to its pledge of moderation in future rate hikes because of the absence of inflation pressures.
icon url

harrypothead

07/07/04 4:10 PM

#53405 RE: OrangeFluffyCat #53368

"Our job is to enhance life,"

This is an incredible, new twist in the so-called "pro-life" movement, but not a surprising twist given their extremist stance. The birth control pill has multiple uses, including it's use as an anti-cancer prophalaxis. They are essentially sacrificing the lives and well being of thousands of women to save the potential life of a several celled zygote. This is yet another example of an extreme element attempting to impose their religious beliefs on the whole. Who is behind these anti-birth control groups, and are they pro-life or simply anti-women?

The Catholic Church continues it's opposition to abortion in all instances, because "nothing good can come from evil," or something along those lines. But the heirarchy is again preaching to the choir. There's a huge disconnect between the heirarchy and mainstream Catholics on matters of sexuality. A church, synogogue, or mosque is not it's establishment, it is it's people. The fact that the Catholic heirarchy believes it has any moral relevancy on matters of sexuality is actually kind of funny.
_____

The Bible thumping logic:

Can birth control pills kill unborn babies?

A dirty, little secret in the pharmaceutical world is that the Pill if taken in a certain way can actually work AFTER conception by preventing the embryo from implanting on the uterine wall. In other words, the pill can cause the baby to die. This is simply abortion by another name.

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-bcpill.html
_____

How do Catholics feel about abortion?

Polls show that Catholics the world over support the right to legal abortion and believe it can be a moral option.

http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/adecisionbottomhigh.htm

One of the problems with intellectual debates on abortion is that there is no commonly agreed to set of technical terms to deal with the moral issues. However, our own definition of terms includes the above distinction between merely being human in the sense that one has human genetic material or human parents, on the one hand, and being a human person in some morally relevant sense, on the other. Further, we try to avoid speaking vaguely about when "life begins," since plant cells, paramecia, individual sperm and other cells are alive. The important question is, when does prenatal life become sophisticated enough that it can be coherently seen as having significant moral status?

http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/cathwomen/AbriefLiberalCatholicDefense.htm
_____