Alright you guys your gettin too quiet. I am going to start a little more debate here re: zone E percentages.
I know you all were posting earlier about the higher percentages of Ta in zone E... does it not make sense that if we have higher % Ta that the higher % Nb will be there as well?
You say you want proof do ya? I propose exbit A for your review.(lol) This is straight from the July 21, 2008 PR.
"Follow-up work will include diamond drilling in the D Zone for grade and tonnage calculations; and further sampling in the East Zone where historical trench samples reported anomalous mineralization (non NI 43-101 compliant): "This 'jacupirangite' horizon contains niobium mineralization throughout most of its length; in one trench (88-3, Figure 7C) a continuous exposure, 14.3 m in length, grading 1.85% Nb2O5 was intersected. Mineralization within this zone was also intersected in trenches 88-4, 88-5 and drill hole 55-13." (Report on the Geology and NB, Y, REE Potential of the East Zone, Nemegosenda Lake Alkaline"
Grading 1.85% Nb205 was intersected. Could it be that there are higher concentrations yet to be found on this WORLD CLASS property?! Me thinks yes.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
