SiouxPal -- look, I'm not trying to get crosswise with you, there's just nothing to answer beyond what I've already stated/linked -- it's a false question based on a premise that murders the reality to dictate one answer -- if you're stuck in that reductionist-to-the-point-of-deeply-into-absurdity frame, thinking it captures the essence of the situation and unwilling to consider the situation as it actually originated and from that start has evolved into what is now, that's not my isssue or failure to answer -- try asking a question that actually has to do with what's real before demanding an answer