Yep, I agreed to the same position when I bought in at .0030 and more at .0007, but I still think we are investing in/with a solid company that makes good decisions with its clients. (Pepsi, Viacom, etc) Why would those clients mentioned want to do business with them? Is it because they just constantly fall for Baron's "scamming" too? I would think not. And I am sure if those large clients thought they were being conned, would you all think that there would be such and influx of lawsuits that it would have shut down the business? We also have to remember, this is the first time/year that they (Baron, not BIHC) have started the stock program with their company. So in less than a year, they made a mistake, (though it wasn't the best way to announce) and the deal falls through, and they still would like to give us a 3 for 1 divy? How many companies do you know, state "Well, the deal didn't work, but we're going to give you a stock dividend anyway?" AND WE MAY OR MAY OR MAY NOT give you a cash divy as promised. But, again: The deal fell through...and still, they should give us a cash divy? I don't know how many business owners we have on this board, but would you do the same thing if you were in his situation even if a deal of yours went through and could possibly jepordize your incoming business cash flow? I think we are all becomming too quick to judge here especially when were all counting on that cash divy over the holidays. And yet, he is still trying to get it done even though the negotiations failed on our part due to that he didn't want the shareholders and the company holding this particular note??? Hmmm...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
