News Focus
News Focus
icon url

bobky

12/11/08 11:58 AM

#23295 RE: nupapa #23293

thanks! eom
icon url

Mango

12/11/08 12:02 PM

#23298 RE: nupapa #23293

"...Dominion presently has no rights to operate their storage facility on our land. If we choose to allow them to lease it or to purchase an easement, we will require language that protects our mineral rights...."

I like that part.


GLTA
icon url

machcobra

12/11/08 12:08 PM

#23301 RE: nupapa #23293

Thanks nupapa for sharing...

Under clear terms! One thing about Adam Marek, he sticks to his guns!

Regardless, under the clear terms of the 1954 agreements with the prior property owner, Dominion presently has no rights to operate their storage facility on our land. If we choose to allow them to lease it or to purchase an easement, we will require language that protects our mineral rights.

icon url

Kristallweizen

12/11/08 1:28 PM

#23318 RE: nupapa #23293

Thanks very much for that update "nupapa"
icon url

wannabanana

12/11/08 2:04 PM

#23334 RE: nupapa #23293

It's refreshing to see such professional responses, especially in pinky world. Most definately Dominion's award sets a legal precedence for case law in favor of Beacon. As he said though, they will most likely appeal. I wonder though if this legal issue will halt further endeavors to extract, excavate, drill, etc.? Beacon seems to have the upper hand here, JMO, Beacon could name their price.