You didn't ask if it 'might have' been used.
...asking whether or not DNAWitness might have actually been used in that case.
You said;
Killer tracked down and arrested. Looks like DNAPrint Genomics was likely involved:
There is a difference there. Not necessarily in content, but definitely in the effect it might have on a reader.
Secondly we were not talking about the direction of the stock or manipulation.......we were talking specifically about the volume. Not the same thing even if you try to tie them together.
Regarding the volume, there have been many occasions where DNAG had good news, yet share price continued down due to the blatant manipulation.
There should nevertheless be 'buying' volume under such a scenario. Unsophisticated investors who just heard about a 'breakthrough' technology, do not have experience with manipulation nor do they know about the company's sordid history, they just want to take a chance with a few bucks. Even if the price is manipulated downward under such circumstances there should still be 'buying' volume. There was none...........even from people such as yourself who 'believes' in the stock and was 'apparently' convinced of DNAWitness involvement.
Makes you go 'hmmmmmmmmmmm'.......... doesn't it?
regards,
frog