News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DragonBits

12/02/08 1:39 AM

#15647 RE: vinmantoo #15646

Vin, there is no way to stop GTC from being able to increase the authorized shares. All they have to do is institute the RS and the number of shares is automatically increased. By a large amount.

If fact that is what I am expecting them to do sooner or later.

Letting them increase the number of shares outstanding now actually means they won’t need to do the RS to increase the number of shares authorized. Not right away at least. And most likely the stock will trade up from 13 cents without the RS after they get the cash and FDA approval.

IMO the reason they don’t reduce spending is because they realize that it won’t matter in the longer run, it will only prolong the time before they need money, the results will be the same. Getting FDA approval shouldn’t make it easier to raise money, but it may well cause a move up in the stock.

I see it one of two ways, either they will dilute old shareholders to 5% of the company, do the RS and get a whole new set of shareholders to invest, or they will get bought out by LFB when they run out of money in late 2009.

This is bascisally what VEXP has done for the last 10 years(dilution and RS). VEXP has had Splits:25-Apr-02 [1:5], 16- Feb-05 [1:50], 07-Dec-07 [1:15]. I think VEXP is the king of RS and dilution, even worse the Ampex was, must worse than any thing GTCB has done. (Dilution)

It all depends on whether LFB wants to fund GTC internally, or LFB wants to use GTC to develop the drug targets, but LFB would rather the public fund the effort. And if so, LFB might want to spin off their shares to the public assuming a better market for biotech. If so, then that would have to mean that GTC would need to become a growth stock sometime in 2010 - 2012, which is possible.

I am curious which way it will go, I lean towards LFB wanting GTC to be able to raise money from the public, but I don't have a strong opinion. IMO is really depends on how much cash LFB has available to fund all of GTC.
icon url

OKY

12/02/08 10:52 AM

#15649 RE: vinmantoo #15646

"when the Ovation deal was announced and there was so little up front cash."

It would be very naive of me to think Ovation would come
up with more cash but I cant help thinking, “What in hell
was Ovation thinking when they made this deal?” I can’t
believe they didn’t see this coming and I can’t believe they
are pulling a takeover. I believe they prefer to collect the
money and let Cox and the boys muck the barn no.

They had to see GTC would fall apart just months before
the US approval or before distribution. This is my whole
rational for holding on. I just have to believe there is
something we don’t understand. I hope it’s not that GTC,
Ovation and LFB are run by IDIOTS. Sorry I’m getting
carried away, but the banking industry certainly proved IQ
isn’t everything.

PS: LEO, what was that all about? No foresight or are the
rumors true that ATryn is being blocked in Europe because
of the trial?

"I do believe in GTC, I do believe in GTC, I do, I do, I do, I do, I do, I do!"
Bert Lahr (kind of)
icon url

MTB

12/02/08 11:25 AM

#15650 RE: vinmantoo #15646

Hi Vin,

I think you are being unduly hard on yourself. If 'smart' is involved, my substantial losses aren't evidence of much :) I'm still holding enough shares that I'd like to see this play out as other than a complete loss . . .

I think what has sucked many of us with scientific/medical backgrounds into the GTCB vortex, is the compelling biotech potential of GTCB. What is our downfall, is the huge divergence between that potential and and how it is being squandered by inept management -- with Cox leading the charge.

Tom Newberry's contempt for shareholders has been manifested in the past. I've never been impressed with his effect or veracity. Redlining his salary would seem a most reasonable step in preserving critical capital -- or at least give him a shovel and send him to the barn to shovel what he dispenses by phone/email now.

Take care,
MTB