News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #69010 on Biotech Values
icon url

DewDiligence

11/25/08 8:56 PM

#69011 RE: apljack #69010

Thanks, aj. Getting back to the business model of KG/ALO… does this NYT article alter your opinion about whether some physicians will defensively gravitate to a pain med that contains a claim of abuse resistance in the FDA label?

If your answer to the above question is Yes, does your opinion change if the FDA label merely contains clinical data about abuse resistance rather than a full-fledged claim?

These two questions are germane to the economic value of a drug like Embeda. T.i.a.
icon url

genisi

01/28/09 7:41 AM

#72323 RE: apljack #69010

ABT - Vicodin CR

Abbott Fires Sales Force Ready to Market Long-Acting Vicodin

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a4bbHzvAySTg&refer=home#

By Tom Randall

Jan. 28 (Bloomberg) -- Abbott Laboratories fired 200 sales representatives preparing to market a new abuse-resistant pain pill after the company stopped plans to introduce the drug this year, people familiar with the matter said.

The drugmaker said in October that the drug, an extended release form of Vicodin, failed to gain U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. The company hasn’t released details of the so-called complete response letter from the FDA.

Vicodin is in a class of powerful pain medications under scrutiny by U.S. regulators and doctors because of increasing abuse rates and a fear the drugs may lose their effectiveness when given over a long period of time. Abbott said its extended release form, Vicodin CR, would be the first in the hydrocodone class of narcotics to provide relief for 12 hours. Other hydrocodone drugs sell for less than $1 a dose and must be taken every four to six hours.

“We’re looking at a path to bring Vicodin CR to market but do not anticipate a launch in 2009,” said Laureen Cassidy, a spokeswoman for Abbott. “Based on the delay in the market availability of Vicodin CR, Abbott is reducing the number of staff supporting our pain-care business.”

If approved, the drug may face skepticism from insurers, who would be reluctant to pay for a more expensive version of a drug that has had generic competition for years, said Tony Butler, an analyst with Barclays Capital in New York.

‘Modest Sales’

“They don’t care how many pills you take,” Butler said in an interview yesterday. “We projected modest numbers even at peak sales. We wouldn’t have thought sales would be much more than a couple hundred million dollars a year,” he said.

The move may benefit King Pharmaceuticals Inc., which bought Alpharma Inc. for $1.3 billion in December, gaining one of a half-dozen companies racing to sell the first long-acting painkillers modified to deter potentially fatal misuse. By buying Alpharma and investing in its own pain drugs, King has positioned itself to lead a market that Ian Sanderson, an analyst at Cowen & Co., has predicted may reach $3 billion by 2015.

Purdue Pharma LP, maker of OxyContin, also is working to develop painkillers that are resistant to abuse.

Abbott rose 34 cents to $54.39 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading yesterday. The company has declined 2 percent in the last 12 months, outperforming the Standard & Poor’s 500 Health Care Index, which fell 19 percent.
icon url

DewDiligence

01/29/09 7:05 PM

#72396 RE: apljack #69010

Pubic Citizen wants Darvon off the market, even though it’s been used
for more than 50 years. An FDA panel considers the matter tomorrow.
Side question: Has there ever been a drug that Public Citizen liked?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123326421629330211.html

FDA Panel to Consider Fate of Darvon, Darvocet

JANUARY 29, 2009, 4:28 P.M. ET
By JENNIFER CORBETT DOOREN

WASHINGTON -- The Food and Drug Administration is asking a panel of medical experts to decide Friday whether it thinks pain pills commonly known as Darvon and Darvocet and used by millions of Americans should remain on the market.

In documents prepared for the meeting, an FDA memo suggested the agency didn't have enough evidence from its own database of adverse-event reports to justify removing the drugs from the marketplace, saying the data were "insufficient" to address the question of whether the products should be removed. The memo said the advisory panel, in making a recommendation about whether the products should be allowed to be marketed in the U.S., needs to focus on whether the drugs are effective at treating pain.

Darvon, which contains the active ingredient propoxyphene, has been on the U.S. market for more than 50 years and was developed by Eli Lilly & Co. Later, the company combined propoxyphene with another pain ingredient, acetaminophen, and sold the pill as Darvocet.

Both drugs are now marketed by private, generic-drug makers including Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc. of Newport, Ky., and Qualitest/Vintage Pharmaceuticals, of Huntsville, Ala. More than 20 million prescriptions were written for the products containing propoxyphene in 2007, according to the FDA.

The products are approved to treat mild to moderate pain. But like certain other classes of pain medications, propoxyphene products can be addictive and have been linked to deaths in patients, especially when used with alcohol and other drugs.

The FDA's action was prompted by a petition and then lawsuit from Public Citizen, a public-advocacy organization that cited data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network, which uses a sample of nationwide autopsy information from medical examiners -- implicating propoxyphene in 5.6% of drug-related deaths from 1981 to 1999. Public Citizen also said the network reported 2,110 accidental deaths related to propoxyphene over the same period.

The group said products should be removed from the market because they are "relatively weak" painkillers and said "toxicity develops at only slightly above the recommended daily dose."

Public Citizen filed its petition with the FDA in 2006 shortly after U.K. health authorities said they'd pull the products off the market amid similar concerns. Public Citizen first asked the parent agency of FDA, which then was the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, to ban the products in 1978 over safety and effectiveness concerns, but the request was rejected in 1979.

Last year, Public Citizen sued the FDA for failure to act on its 2006 petition. Now the agency is taking the matter to an outside panel of medical experts on Friday for advice.

The agency said a review of its adverse-event reporting data base showed 3,028 serious and nonserious reports from 1957 through Sept. 24, 2008, associated with propoxyphene. Of those, 2,136 reports were considered serious and included 1,452 deaths. Many of the serious-event reports included reports of suicides, intentional drug overdoses, heart attacks and unintentional drug overdoses, the FDA said. The agency said some of the serious adverse-event reports also listed more than one type of drug.

Two of the companies marketing propoxyphene-containing drugs, Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Qualitest/Vintage Pharmaceuticals, said the products are safe and effective when used as directed. The companies said more than 600 million prescriptions for propoxyphene drugs have been dispensed over the last 50 years.

The companies also said the fact that U.K. health authorities pulled similar products off the market isn't relevant in the U.S., where a higher dose of propoxyphene is used. The companies said the lower doses previously used in the U.K. likely resulted in the conclusion that the drugs weren't effective at treating pain.

In 2005, U.K. health authorities said the benefits of the drugs didn't outweigh the risks and announced a phased withdrawal of the products over a three-year period.‹