Hmmm, Echo, you part of Nanoviricdes management, seems like its the only thread you post on? You can let us know, I know Dr. s reads the board.
Or just tell us why add 6 months more? which, would be this time next year? And why would it be any different this time next year then it would be by April 2009? If not by April, is more time really the issue, or as Dr. F states, something more than a bad market is happening with the stock?
As much as I'd hate to see Dr F's deadline come and go, hope has to give way to hard results of the money deal kind, Pharma like at some point. 4 years should be enough.
If they got the goods then they should have the proof within Dr. F's time frame, imo.
After all should the shareholders be paying management the bucks to live the 'good life' while our investment evaporates?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
