I don't believe I was talking to you, so you might have missed what led up to that post. Benz asked me if I had a solution to the inequity in this country. THAT was my ideal solution.....nothing to do with the reality on the ground. I don't for a minute think it could/would ever happen.
Your response again twists things to make it sound like you have a point....which you don't.
"All those who believe this should just move to the Middle East, where the sultans of terror will readily remove you of all but the basic needs of life, while they have solid gold cars built and walk over their 200 wives and concubines."
Under a salary cap, there would be no sultans.
"Did Obama give away everything over 1 million the year he made it? I'll answer that for you. He donated, I believe, less than 1% to charity. But then, that does not tell you anything, right?"
Again, I was speaking hypothetically, so why bring Obama into it? Caps would be compulsory, not voluntary.
"If you want to start limiting salaries, let's start with limiting those with the lowest IQs first. How about giving medical researchers the $1 million limit and making the dumb-as-mud "athaletes" cap off at $50K and the liberal, high school educated actors at $75K. Only in America can liberal morons and guys who can't read but can shoot a ball through a hoop earn millions and millions."
Here we agree, but again, I find your tone ugly and arrogant.
If you want to debate, I'll be glad to oblige. If you want to rant, go see a shrink.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
