ZOLT wins in court and that has nothing to do with the bashers. They down play that stock and continue their campaign of goodwill bashing. How much is one suppose to believe when ZOLT is winning the cases in court where innuendo, fabrication, convenient logic and conjecture do not apply, only the facts.
But ZOLT is a prime example of what is going on in the message boards.
Eventually, the message boards are going to have to moderate the postings to keep innuendo and emotional BS limited to providing the facts.
If a poster calls someone a P&D then where is the proof. The trading records, copies mass emails of unrealistic projuections, admission of trading etc. What about proving the fact and supplying the underlying basis for calling someone a crook like where is the supporting documentation?
If someone is disgruntled because of being associated with the company previously, then what merit can you put on their spin?
Just seems to convenient, the company wins in court but the internet posters blow it off but they want to win in the courts to keep their aliases and their idenities hidden so they can post innunedoes and accussations that they should not ever have to support or prove in court.
Times are changing ... Posters should be held accountable for their accussations and goodwill (character) attacks.
:-) Gary
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
