This is rubbish. Tao was funded by Outboard for $1M, which was canceled and then partly re-negotiated early last month for the $125K they received on the outset. Check the SEC filing on it. If you don't already know this, then you're either new to Tao, haven't done your homework yet on Tao, or are quite simply bashing Tao for no good reason.
You've made 3 posts (on Tao) and 3 incorrect statements this evening.
1. You imply Tao was funded through a "friendly" Lawsuit -"i.e arrangement made outside of a courtroom". Most folks would call this being Financed. In fact, this whole line of thought doesn't even make sense.
2. You imply that Tao "has not yet been subject of a Sarasota settlement hearing". Insubstantial. Rumor-mongering. There are zero facts that support this. Bashing.
3. And this makes the least sense of all. You imply that Tao is a shell company. About to be sued by their financiers. Which proves what again? That they're in cahoots together? That they are indeed a shell company? I've never understood this line of reasoning from Now_Now_Child and I'm not going to try to understand it from you.
Im sorry but if this is all you can come up with, then please crawl back into your cardboard box and leave this discussion for the grown-ups. I draw the line at making stuff up.
Market Data 
Markets 
