News Focus
News Focus
icon url

downsideup

11/08/08 5:47 PM

#120045 RE: IH Admin [Shelly] #120042

I see what you are saying, but it suggests the problem is in something else in the specific behavior on the list, that isn't actually about the topic of marks ? Share price, also, is share specific and relevant. I guess you see the same thing with other repetitive posts, too... "OK, we're up $0.0002 to $0.0012 on that last trade" which may be both truthful, interesting, and relevant... but it isn't if every post updates the latest change in the tick... the size of every trade, etc. Who needs that ?

Board marks likely go up along with active, deliberate, recruiting that takes place, with the purpose of driving a stock price... with purposeful efforts to generate momentum... as it does with active recruiting to buy or sell shares conducted in other venues by other methods.

Suggests to me that the need is a definition of when repetitive becomes too repetitive... if repetitiveness is the problem.


icon url

Billybob_TX

11/08/08 6:24 PM

#120048 RE: IH Admin [Shelly] #120042

Again, my original question arose through the deletion of several posts of mine that indicated the boardmarks of the particular board at that particular time.

My question is why are the boardmarks even noted if they are not topical or "on topic" to the stock? And if there is some sort of measurement implied by the boardmarks, how are we to measure them if all references to the boardmarks are deleted? And to remind those who may not have taken mathematics or statistics, one must have a relation in order to measure anything.
icon url

Billybob_TX

11/08/08 6:29 PM

#120050 RE: IH Admin [Shelly] #120042

Following your logic, any post on price change, volume change, MM bid and ask prices, or any other fluid relational change of the stock would be off topic. You better get to deleting.

icon url

jscot

11/09/08 2:36 AM

#120072 RE: IH Admin [Shelly] #120042

So in all reality higher numbers of boardmarks, could mean

more interest in the board/stock, wading or not. We all have

to wade through a bunch of Blah blah blah here in penny/sub

penny world, which is all that anyone at IHUB is interested

in to begin with. It is up to every individual to wade through

the noise and determine if they want to invest/gamble on any

particular stock. No one should expect to come here and read 1

or 2 messages on a board for free advice as to where to put

their money.
icon url

intheclouds

09/03/09 9:35 AM

#131771 RE: IH Admin [Shelly] #120042

I don't get your point. It stirs up conversation about the company and the board.....