Replies to post #9254 on Brilliant Technologies Corp. (fka BLLN)

[luckybleu]

I thought sony and warner were signed at first also,but with no announcements and then no other music added from those catalogs,common sense said that they werent on board,my opinion is its not a financial problem that they are not signed,I think its with the business model ,mainly the p2p aspect, I think they will launch with or with out them and hopefully blln will be able to sign them ,with high users and good ad revenue, if they arent with the program before the launch hopefully they will be after.If you look at the sony deal that was announced in 2007 (may I think) you could listen to a song 5 times then you had to buy it.So its some kind of B.S. like that and my opinion is A.K. has done everything he could do to accomadate the labels, DRM ,No macs or Ipods ,huge upfront fees,I hope he makes no more compromises to the service hes tried to build for 7 years.

[AVDI_1]

hold your horses Germboy....what GoQ stated if i remember correctly was that the music being uploaded indicated that the labels were on board and logic would make one think that would mean they were signed.....and as always when ever Go Q points something out of interest he does add that it is only his opinion and nothing more....when information is right on every one is happy and the source is a hero....when it does not pan out....well sometimes it makes one look a little...you know....misinformed.....

P.S. i am always glad for any input that Q offers up....he is usually close if not right on the mark....so i am happy that he is here with us.....cut him some slack! thanks and have a great day!