Wrong -- it's very easy to go on the attack when a complete buffoon posts absurd statements such as "if there's a net loss for 1 restaurant, doesn't that mean 3 restaurants equals 3 times the net loss?"
lol lol lol lol
I guess if I was bored enough, I'd school your ignorane by showing you dozens of profitable publicly traded restaurant companies that showed a net loss with their restaurants which got samller and smaller as they added more restaurants until they broke-even.
Yes, I have business experience. More importantly I business analysis expeience that's been immensely successful -- and I'd never make such a stupid statemnt to think if a restaurnat chain isn't profitable with its very 1st restaurant than more restaurants just mean an equal multitude of net losses. ROFL!!! I'd expect that childish thinking from.....a child maybe? You sure you were born in 1953 and not 1993?
It's so easy to defend ALL of my statements -- but i notice you couldn't come up with a single examle when challenged yet I had a cyber buffet of your ignorant statements in such a short posting history of which to choose. Anything else is easily provable and/or verifiable. I sure hope you play golf better than you debate and not make as much of an ass of yourself on the course.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
