Replies to post #155 on What ain't workin'

[August]

P.S> "preview would surely be appreciated.

I don't care so much about a spell check, but in the case of long winded posts(or maybe that's a hint<G>) it would sure help to preview my message so I know whe I sent it, it's the way I intended. instead of scrambling to get it before the edit window is closed.

[JXM]

Not sure if this is the right forum for this.

But one thing that ain't working is the concept of one board per stock. If you have a chairman who is biased on a given stock, one way or another, there is no way to provide a balanced view.

I created this thread as an alternative to SEVU.
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/board.asp?board_id=396

I posted a link to the thread on the original SEVU board (message deleted, though posting a link should not be a TOU)

Here is my opinion on the matter.
http://www.investorshub.com/beta/read_msg.asp?message_id=50383

That would seem to be a major hole in their policy. Because then there is no way that you can guarantee an unbiased moderation of threads.

It will be interesting to see what happens. If iHub deletes the unmoderated thread, then I believe that it will be a sign that the site will not be able to maintain credibility with serious investors.

This is one rule that they need to re-think.

BTW: why did you delete my post? If the IH admin deletes the board, that is one thing, but there was nothing in violation of the TOUs by posting the link.

I believe that the success of this site as a general forum for stock discussions, beyond OTC:BB hyping, is dependent on iHub changing this policy.